MEEG Automated Workflow System SPM toolbox

Welcome to MEAW SYSTEM® homepage (β version)

MEEG Automated Workflow System (MEAW SYSTEMTM®)

By Precision Medicine Centre, Hokuto Hospital, Japan

Just load your data using the GUI and perform statistical easily! MEAW SYSTEM® is a Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM, https://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/)-based toolbox which allows you to analyse Magnetoencephalography (MEG) data without any troublesome procedures or operations.
We also provide control/reference data (Hokuto 102), which is comparable with data from patients/participants.

MEAW SYSTEM® enables you to concentrate on your own study goals and patients.

To download MEAW SYSTEM® and Hokuto 102 or obtain more information,
email us: meaw.system[at]gmail.com (Please replace [at] with @)
Could you please make the title ‘Inquiry about MEAW SYSTEM®‘?

Hideyuki HOSHI, System Engineering and Researcher
Yoshihito SHIGIHARA, MD PhD, Director
MEAW developing team in Precision Medicine Centre, Hokuto Hospital, Japan

Acknowledgement

We thank Dr Samuel CHEADLE for editing English in this homepage

Conflict of interest

This study was partially supported by RICOH.
The sponsor has no control over designing the study, recoding and analysing data in this study.

Figure 1. Concept of analysis using MEAW SYSTEM®

Update information

• 18th January 2019: Control data for Resting state scanning (with eyes-closed, COH, GS, IID inversion) released.
• 18th January 2019: MEAW SYSTEM® adapted to MEG data from Yokogawa-KIT system.
• 18th January 2019: MEAW SYSTEM® version β released.

Available MEG datatypes

• Yokogawa-KIT MEG
• RICOH MEG

Available Task type

• Resting state for 5 min

Control/reference data, Hokuto 102

• Number of participants: 102
• Age and gender: 22-75 years old (Average 44 years old), 54 females
• Participant profile: No serious diseases, disorders, nor disabilities
• Research ethics approval: This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Hokuto Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant when they were enrolled.

Figure 2. Histogram for age